ARCOM

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Fahmy, A, Hassan, T, Bassioni, H and McCaffer, R (2019) Dynamic scheduling model for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 313–30.

Geekiyanage, D and Ramachandra, T (2020) Nexus between running costs and building characteristics of commercial buildings: hedonic regression modelling. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 389–406.

Ling, F Y, Zhang, Z and Wong, W T (2020) How personality traits influence management styles of construction project managers. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 453–68.

Mathar, H, Assaf, S, Hassanain, M A, Abdallah, A and Sayed, A M (2020) Critical success factors for large building construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 349–67.

Mwesigwa, R, Nabwami, R, Mayengo, J and Basulira, G (2020) Contractual completeness as a cornerstone to stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 469–84.

Shojaei, P and bolvardizadeh, A (2020) Rough MCDM model for green supplier selection in Iran: a case of university construction project. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 437–52.

Shooshtarian, S, Lingard, H and Wong, P S (2020) Using the cost of construction work to trigger legislative duties for WHS: the Australian experience. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 369–87.

Vilventhan, A and Rajadurai, R (2019) 4D Bridge Information Modelling for management of bridge projects: a case study from India. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 423–35.

Wuni, I Y and Shen, G Q (2020) Stakeholder management in prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction projects: benchmarking the key result areas. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 407–21.

Yap, J B H and Chow, I N (2020) Investigating the managerial ‘‘nuts and bolts’’ for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 331–48.

• Type: Journal Article
• Keywords: Construction industry; Factor analysis; Overruns; Performance management; Project management; Ranking;
• ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
• URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2019-0094
• Abstract:
  Managerial shortfalls can considerably undermine the delivery performance of construction projects. This paper appraises the project management essentials (PMEs) for successful construction project delivery. Following a detailed literature review, a questionnaire survey was developed encompassing 20 PMEs that were identified. An opinion questionnaire survey was used to facilitate data collection from key construction stakeholders in the Malaysian construction industry. The survey data were subjected to descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis. Findings indicated that the leading PMEs are competency of the project team, competency of project manager, good leadership, effective planning and control and realistic cost and time estimate. Spearman’s rank correlation tests affirmed a good agreement on the ranking of PMEs across stakeholder groups. The present study found that PMEs for construction have a total of four dimensions, namely: scope, communication and competence management; stakeholder commitment and collaborative engagement; construction time–cost planning and control; and environment, health, safety and quality management. The findings could potentially contribute to the development of appropriate project management best practices to address managerial shortfalls in Malaysia and other developing countries. This paper bridges the identified knowledge gap about critical managerial dimensions for successful project management in construction. The present study adds to the existing body of knowledge around this under-explored area in the construction management literature.